[ppml] mail auth proposals, was Re: the "other"...
Edward Lewis
Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz
Mon Apr 9 12:54:26 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] mail auth proposals, was Re: the "other"...
- Next message: [ppml] mail auth proposals, was Re: the "other"...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 9:44 -0700 4/9/07, Bill Woodcock wrote: >Thus, I'd like to see us at least try what's been proven to work >everywhere else. Okay. It's fair to say that it is time we (membership) put PGP into play. But why is this policy and not something under the ACSP? Sorry for seeming to derail the question at hand, yeah, I know it's not germane to the topic at hand but as I dig deeper I wonder when do we cross the line from "policies" to "services." -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar Sarcasm doesn't scale.
- Previous message: [ppml] mail auth proposals, was Re: the "other"...
- Next message: [ppml] mail auth proposals, was Re: the "other"...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list