[ppml] the "other" policy proposals
Martin Hannigan
martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs
Mon Apr 9 01:52:23 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] the "other" policy proposals
- Next message: [ppml] the "other" policy proposals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> To: Martin Hannigan <martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs> Cc: ppml at arin.net Subject: Re: [ppml] the "other" policy proposals Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 21:07:56 -0700 (PDT) > > Shouldnt the discussion be around "why not both" > > Marty, the policy is only 44 words long. So far, you've > spent 793 words critiquing it. Don't you think it would > have made sense to at least _read_ it first? > > This policy adds support for PGP, and does not remove > support for X.509. Heh. I guess I did make a mistake. I thought that none of this stuff was in place since I don't use it. It's likely that I'm not the only one who missed it. You could've pointed out that I did put an effort into participating, that I made a mistake, and then simply pointed me at the relevant section. I'm not going to be intimidated into not participating, but you do realize that there is an effect on others? Enough said. Best, Martin
- Previous message: [ppml] the "other" policy proposals
- Next message: [ppml] the "other" policy proposals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list