[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-7: Creation of Policy for Subsequent End-User IP Requests/Assignments

Since no one seems to have commented on this or the other policies that
appear to be designed to clean up parts of the NRPM, I will.

I entirely support all of this proposal, as well as 2007-8, 2007-9,
2007-10, and 2007-11.  I think the authors should be thanked for
putting together a set of proposals that will rationalize some rather
confusing parts of the NRPM.  I know that we'll consider each of these
five proposals independently, but I hope that all of them will be
passed with minimal criticism, as all of them simply "make sense".

-David


> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 12:13:31PM -0500, Member Services wrote:
> > On 1 March 2007 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) concluded its review
> > of 'Creation of Policy for Subsequent End-User IP
> > Requests/Assignments' and accepted it as a formal policy proposal for
> > discussion by the community.
> > 
> > The proposal is designated Policy Proposal 2007-7: Creation of Policy
> > for Subsequent End-User IP Requests/Assignments The proposal text is
> > below and can be found at:
> > http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2007_7.html
> > 
> > All persons in the community are encouraged to discuss Policy
> > Proposal 2007-7 prior to it being presented at the ARIN Public Policy
> > Meeting in San Juan, Puerto Rico, 23-24 April 2007. Both the discussion
> > on the Public Policy Mailing List and at the Public Policy Meeting will
> > be used to determine the community consensus regarding this policy proposal.
> > 
> > The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found at:
> > http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html
> > 
> > ARIN's Policy Proposal Archive can be found at:
> > http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/proposal_archive.html
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Member Services
> > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> > 
> > 
> > ## * ##
> > 
> > Policy Proposal 2007-7: Creation of Policy for Subsequent End-User IP
> > Requests/Assignments
> > 
> > Author: Alex Rubenstein
> > 
> > Proposal Version: 1
> > 
> > Submission Date: 15 February 2007
> > 
> > Proposal type: New
> > 
> > Policy term: Permanent
> > 
> > Policy statement:
> > 
> > 4.3.6, Additional Assignments
> > 
> > 	"In order to justify an additional assignment, end-users must have
> > efficiently utilized at least 80% of all previous assignments, and must
> > provide ARIN with utilization details. The prefix size for an additional
> > assignment is determined by applying policies 4.3.2, and 4.3.3."
> > 
> > Rationale:
> > 
> > There are no published criteria for additional assignment requests from
> > end-user networks. NRPM 4.3 seems to only cover initial assignments.
> > NRPM 4.3.3 states, in part, "Requesters must show exactly how previous
> > address assignments have been utilized and must provide appropriate
> > details to verify their one-year growth projection." Unfortunately, the
> > above text does not specify any metrics for ARIN staff to apply when
> > determining if an additional assignment is justified. Though most
> > end-users only get one assignment, some end-users request a 2nd or 3rd
> > or Nth assignment.
> > 
> > Currently, the ARIN staff applies what they perceive to be "efficient
> > utilization" criteria; for instance, the end-user must have utilized at
> > least 80% of last assignment and must provide ARIN with utilization details.
> > 
> > Timetable for implementation: Immediate
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > PPML mailing list
> > PPML at arin.net
> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml