[ppml] My view on IPv4 (was: Re: IPv4 wind-down)
Bob Evans
bob at FiberInternetCenter.com
Wed Apr 4 12:37:31 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] My view on IPv4 (was: Re: IPv4 wind-down)
- Next message: [ppml] My view on IPv4 (was: Re: IPv4 wind-down)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
After following for sometime - Paying one's taxes online and checking how your congress person voted, doesnt drive the desire for internet ..... I feel the need to remind that "primarly" (unfortunately) it's PORNO that needs to go first - that seems to start everything. If comcast does offer IPv6 and there is such content via IPv6 , customers will begin to ask/expect IPv6. Therefore, any network that provides consumer access or co-lo services should begin IPv6 to be ready for the content that does drive the desire (if not porno-but most likely). bob evans >> If a Comcast wants to deploy v6 alongside v4, that would be >> fine as far as >> my view goes... The problem is that everyone wants someone else to go >> first. Still doesn't change the fact that we don't have any >> users asking >> for v6... > > Doesn't the US DOD count as a user? The US Government? The research > community? These sectors are all asking for v6 and many more users are > asking for v6 roadmaps. In other words, if your company has a realistic > roadmap towards implementing v6 services, you stand a better chance of > selling v4 services (or not losing existing v4 customers). > > --Michael Dillon > _______________________________________________ > This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List > (PPML at arin.net). > Manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml > > www.FiberInternetCenter.com
- Previous message: [ppml] My view on IPv4 (was: Re: IPv4 wind-down)
- Next message: [ppml] My view on IPv4 (was: Re: IPv4 wind-down)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list