[ppml] Summary of Trial Balloons for Dealing with IPv4AddressCountdown
Kevin Loch
kloch at kl.net
Wed Apr 4 11:45:39 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Summary of Trial Balloons for Dealing with IPv4AddressCountdown
- Next message: [ppml] IPv4 wind-down
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Williamson wrote: > I'll openly admit that the present 6-to-4 infrastructure is, at best, > very poor. Frankly, I'm not sure that an IPv4 core combined with a v6 > edge is any better than a highly NAT'd all v4 world. Moving everything > to v6 would probably be beneficial to everyone (as a whole), but until > it's beneficial to individuals (and enterprises), I just don't see it > moving quickly. Your mileage may vary. As someone who has to deal with rfc1918 collisions almost daily, I can see benefits of v6 edge over nat. Of course this would require teredo and not 6to4 to have only one v4 address per site. - Kevin
- Previous message: [ppml] Summary of Trial Balloons for Dealing with IPv4AddressCountdown
- Next message: [ppml] IPv4 wind-down
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list