[ppml] 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
Divins, David
dsd at servervault.com
Fri Sep 29 13:58:57 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Next message: [ppml] 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
When I received my assignments from ARIN, I had to sign a document and submit payment. I believe there is a legal contract between ARIN and the recipient. I would assume normal Contract Law applies if one party falls off the earth for address reclamation. This really should be a question for ARIN's council, who should be at the meeting in St. Louis. -dsd David Divins Principal Engineer ServerVault Corp. (703) 652-5955 -----Original Message----- From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Dudek Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 9:51 AM To: Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com Cc: ppml at arin.net Subject: Re: [ppml] 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation What happens when ARIN can no longer contact them or if they have decided to cut contact with ARIN? Aaron Dudek (703) 689-6879 Sprintlink Engineering adudek at sprint.net On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote: >> The thing about which I wonder more though is why a codified sunset >> for the allocation, which basically forces a migration upon the >> adopters at such time as ARIN decides that you can stick a fork in >> the technology because it's baked, would make the policy proposal >> more (instead of radically less) palatable? Am I missing something here? > > I think that any kind of sunset or expiry clause is a bad idea. As > long as ARIN maintains contact with the organizations who receive the > addresses, then there is the possibility of a future policy change > that involves returning those addresses. > > Today, we are completely ignorant of the situation in three year's > time so we can't show any good reason for forcing the migration. But, > in three years, ARIN will have the facts at their disposal and all the > affected parties will be able to join in the decision making. > It is better to leave the decision to a later date and remove any > sundown provisions. > > --Michael Dillon > > _______________________________________________ > PPML mailing list > PPML at arin.net > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml > _______________________________________________ PPML mailing list PPML at arin.net http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
- Previous message: [ppml] 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Next message: [ppml] 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list