[ppml] ARIN member in good standing?
Tom Vest
tvest at pch.net
Fri Sep 29 10:43:37 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] ARIN member in good standing?
- Next message: [ppml] ARIN member in good standing?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 29, 2006, at 9:48 AM, Peter Sherbin wrote: >> You would bill the packet originator, not the destination? > > Yes, the originator of the packet pays to a transport provider I won't burden PPML with any more on this topic (happy to elsewhere if there is interest), but I think you should remember that this arrangement ceased to be viable even in the switched telecom world c. early 1990s, as soon as it became possible to extend infrastructure and/or contractual arrangements across billing zones and so change the identification of "originator". Only way to counter that is to switch from a settlement-based to (flat) interconnection-based model (prob the more common adaptation strategy over the last decade), or close the borders and aggressively monitor/police all cross-border traffic (the apparent strategy of choice for the years to come). TV
- Previous message: [ppml] ARIN member in good standing?
- Next message: [ppml] ARIN member in good standing?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list