[ppml] 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation

I'm not convinced such a suitable protocol alternative (for all allowable
uses of the policy) will ever be developed, let alone fully deployed.  I'd
favor avoiding a sunset clause in favor of changing the policy later if
needed.

-Scott

On 09/26/06 at 5:20pm -0400, Jason Schiller <schiller at uu.net> wrote:

> Would people be more in favor of 2006-2 if it has a sundown clause that
> would require an organization to return the internal microallocation once
> there is a fully deployed suitable protocol alternative that alleviates
> the need for an internal microallocation?
>
> Or should the ARIN membership simply revoke this portion through the
> public policy mechanism when that time comes?
>
> __Jason
>
>
> ==========================================================================
> Jason Schiller                                               (703)886.6648
> Senior Internet Network Engineer                         fax:(703)886.0512
> Public IP Global Network Engineering                       schiller at uu.net
> UUNET / Verizon                         jason.schiller at verizonbusiness.com
>
> The good news about having an email address that is twice as long is that
> it increases traffic on the Internet.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
>