[ppml] Multihome Pro Con Document
Azinger, Marla
marla.azinger at frontiercorp.com
Tue Oct 17 16:01:47 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Multihome Pro Con Document
- Next message: [ppml] Multihome Pro Con Document
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michel- That is true. When reading through the Pro's and Cons you will see that they address that point. Granted, it doesnt say it point blank and you have to comprehend what the pro's and con's are, but yes, this is true to be one of the hurdles we face. -----Original Message----- From: Michel Py [mailto:michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us] Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 4:37 PM To: Azinger, Marla; ppml at arin.net Subject: RE: [ppml] Multihome Pro Con Document Hi Marla, While this document does a decent job at describing solutions, it does not address the #1 reason why no solution is deployed a decade after we started working on finding one: palatability of the solution to the end users. In other words: what are the realistic chances of a given solution to be successfully deployed in the real world. The main issue with IPv6 multihoming is not the pros and cons of solutions, but their deployability. Failure to understand this is why, 10 years after, we still are discussing the pros and cons of solutions. Michel.
- Previous message: [ppml] Multihome Pro Con Document
- Next message: [ppml] Multihome Pro Con Document
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list