[ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Thu Oct 5 16:40:36 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
- Next message: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 5-okt-2006, at 21:46, Thomas Narten wrote: >> Is there any reason PI /48s shouldn't be allocated with the bisection >> method, thus removing the need to reserve space? > I too, have the same question. See my earlier message. > I think it is short-sighted to assume > that every end site will find a /48 to be enough space. Maybe most > will. But there is no reason to lock that in today if not really > necessary. So, better to allocate using sparse allocation. Keep our > options open. So what is the downside of simply giving out an additional, non- growable prefix when a /48 isn't enough? Or just give out the space that would have been reserved immediately, i.e., give out /44s instead of /48s?
- Previous message: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
- Next message: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list