[ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Thu Oct 5 12:17:34 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
- Next message: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Is there any reason PI /48s shouldn't be allocated with the bisection method, thus removing the need to reserve space? Thanks, -drc On Oct 5, 2006, at 3:14 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > Hi, > > I understand that ARIN wants to give out /48s for PI but reserve a / > 44. That's a bad idea, see the message below about this that I sent > to the RIPE address policy list. > > Begin forwarded message: > >> History, both in IPv4 and IPv6, has shown that keeping space in >> reserve to accommodate future request doesn't work very well: >> people often end up announcing several blocks anyway. So let's not >> waste the space and make filtering harder by doing this. Also, >> since a /48 is an incredible amount of space to begin with, coming >> back for more should be rare in IPv6. > >> The advantage of only giving out /48s with no unused space between >> them is that if, for instance, 12000 /48s are given out, that will >> be from a single /34 and allowing /48s from a /34 allows 16384 >> routes, while allowing /48s from a /20 (because for every /48 of >> 12000 a /32 is kept in reserve) allows 268 million routes, more >> than enough to overload any reasonable routing system in an attack. > > _______________________________________________ > PPML mailing list > PPML at arin.net > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml > >
- Previous message: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
- Next message: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list