[ppml] Policy Proposal writing
Edward Lewis
Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz
Thu Oct 5 10:44:47 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Staff Comments Regarding Policy Proposal 2006-3
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal writing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 15:27 +0100 10/5/06, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote: >Why are policy writers so concerned with the minutiae >of what ARIN must do? We are supposed to be writing >ARIN policies, not writing ARIN's process manual. (Maybe) Because proposals keep getting bounced at open meetings for not being specific enough. >The gist of this policy seems to be: > > For each address range which ARIN has issued, > ARIN will publish the list of allowed originating > ASes as supplied by the authorized user for each > netblock within that range. ARIN will form a public > working group to produce a document specifying the > requirements, and implementation details at the end > of 6 months after this policy is ratified by the board > of trustees. > >What more needs to be said in the NPRM? I think that if you gave that as a "mission statement" to a WG, the result might not be what is intended. I believe the intention is to prepare certificates with all this stuff, the above makes it seem that entries in WhoIs could be the end goal. >The technical details can be hashed out on a WG mailing >list. Whatever reaches consensus within 6 months goes >into the document and the WG dissolves. Then staff >implement it. If anything in that document needs a >policy change to make it so, then you can bet that it >WILL be brought to our attention. The Trustees can be >trusted to see to that. Of course, I am assuming the WG is not carrying any other context other than the statement above. The WG can be carefully selected to bring in the needed context though, but then we get towards "subjective" selection which might cause heartburn. The above suggestion is pretty close to what I suggested at the open mic a year ago (the first "an attendee"): http://arin.net/meetings/minutes/ARIN_XVI/mem_minutes.html#anchor_9 I suppose it's a matter of "do we set up coarse proposals that get refined later" or "do we refine proposals and pass the final text?" -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar Secrets of Success #107: Why arrive at 7am for the good parking space? Come in at 11am while the early birds drive out to lunch.
- Previous message: [ppml] Staff Comments Regarding Policy Proposal 2006-3
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal writing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list