[ppml] Staff Comments Regarding Policy Proposal 2006-3

At 12:10 +0100 10/5/06, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote:
>>   The policy duplicates
>>  capabilities of the routing registry and could be addressed by enhancing
>>  this existing functionality.
>
>This is a very important observation. I would rather

I certainly agree with that.

"The" routing registry or "a" routing registry?

>see a policy that defines the purpose and scope of
>ARIN's routing registry. That policy could include
>text like the following:
>
>>  ARIN will collect an optional field in all IPv4 and IPv6 address block
>>  transactions (allocation and assignment requests, reallocation and
>>  reassignment actions, transfer and experimental requests). This
>>  additional field will be used to record a list of the ASes that the user
>>  permits to originate address prefixes within the address block.

Will ARIN need to process (more/new) templates to permit updates to 
the information?


-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar

Secrets of Success #107: Why arrive at 7am for the good parking space?
Come in at 11am while the early birds drive out to lunch.