[ppml] 2006-7 IPV6 Initial Allocation suggested changes- Input Requested
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Mon Nov 13 16:10:09 EST 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] 2006-7 IPV6 Initial Allocation suggested changes-Input Requested
- Next message: [ppml] 2006-7 IPV6 Initial Allocation suggested changes- InputRequested
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sorry... Thought I had. Owen On Nov 13, 2006, at 12:57 PM, Azinger, Marla wrote: > Hi Owen- Thank you for your input. Would you mind sending your > response to the ppml and not just me? > > Thank you > Marla > > -----Original Message----- > From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen at delong.com] > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:52 PM > To: Azinger, Marla > Subject: Re: [ppml] 2006-7 IPV6 Initial Allocation suggested changes- > Input Requested > > > My preference is for #3. I think it provides the greatest > flexibility in meeting the widest > range of organization's needs while still preserving reasonable > process and requirements. > > > Owen > >> Suggested Change #3 (leaves item d in place with the 200 /48 text >> and adds a new item e but does not require ASN) >> Insert line item e. to 6.5.1.1 with the following: >> 'To qualify for an initial allocation of IPV6 address space, an >> organization must': >> e. OR be an organization new to providing internet services, and >> can justify intent to announce the requested IPV6 address space >> within one year, through records such as contracts, inventory and/ >> or other applicable documentation. >
- Previous message: [ppml] 2006-7 IPV6 Initial Allocation suggested changes-Input Requested
- Next message: [ppml] 2006-7 IPV6 Initial Allocation suggested changes- InputRequested
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list