[ppml] Proposed Policy: Recommended v6 aggregation practices
Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Tue May 2 05:02:00 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: Recommended v6 aggregation practices
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2005-1: Provider-independent IPv6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> While I do not necessarily disagree with the content of the policy, I do > not believe ARIN is the correct place for a BCP on route aggregation. I > do not claim to know where the best place is > (IETF/IANA/Juniper/Linksys?) however; I do know I'm not crazy about it > being ARIN. It's quite simple. The best place is a forum where network operators gather to discuss and agree on best inter-AS routing practices. Unfortunately, such a forum does not currently exist. Now, if you want to try to create such a forum, then I would argue that ARIN is the best place to try this. Of course, eventually the routing forum would either need to expand globally or else accept that much routing policy can be handled differently in different continents. But there really is no point trying to come to agreement or document best practice unless you have a substantial number of AS holders in the discussion. That is the fundamental problem. In the absence of such a forum I am happy to have ARIN publish recommended practices. They have as much right to do this as anyone else. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: Recommended v6 aggregation practices
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2005-1: Provider-independent IPv6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list