[ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
Peter Sherbin
pesherb at yahoo.com
Fri Jun 30 18:17:15 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Next message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Maria, Could you pls. elaborate on customers not wanting PI: 1. How many customers 2. By customer: average monthly traffic volume, mumber of links to peers/transit providers, link sizes 3. Nature of the business 4. Geographical location Thanks, Peter --- "Azinger, Marla" <marla_azinger at eli.net> wrote: > Yes, I get what you are saying. The fact being overlooked here is that no matter > how it boils down, I have customers that do not want PI space. I understand that > there are some enterprises that think PI space is their dream answer. But not > everyone has the same dream. > > Marla > > -----Original Message----- > From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of > Owen DeLong > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:21 PM > To: Scott Leibrand; Jason Schiller (schiller at uu.net) > Cc: ppml at arin.net; brian.knight at us.mizuho-sc.com > Subject: Re: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure > > > > > --On June 29, 2006 2:56:25 PM -0400 Scott Leibrand <sleibrand at internap.com> > wrote: > > > Another consideration is that a PA /48 need not be accepted globally to be > > usable for multihoming. If both your transit providers accept your /48 > > from you and from each other, you can be guaranteed reachability. (You > > may not be able to do the kind of traffic engineering you might want, > > though.) > > > If their upstreams don't accept it, then, no, you aren't guaranteed > reachability. You're just slightly less subject to MOST of the things > that take out PART of one of the providers. > > However, I've discussed this issue with Marla at length, and, it boils down > to her belief that her customers perceive getting PI space as a complicated > and expensive process. I suggested several ways she could work around this > issue to both her company's and her customers benefit. She remains > unconvinced. > > I think the cooperating filter policy suggestion is about the best way to > handle this. If two ISPs want to cooperate and open holes in their PA > blocks with each other, that doesn't mean anyone else has to. Yes, it > does mean multihoming for those customers is slightly less reliable than > for customers using PI space, but, I don't see a big downside to that. > > Owen > > > -- > If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me. > _______________________________________________ > PPML mailing list > PPML at arin.net > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
- Previous message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Next message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list