[ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
Marshall Eubanks
tme at multicasttech.com
Fri Jun 30 10:15:49 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Next message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello; On Jun 30, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Scott Leibrand wrote: > On 06/30/06 at 9:01am -0400, Robert E.Seastrom > <ppml at rs.seastrom.com> wrote: > >> Scott Leibrand <sleibrand at internap.com> writes: >> >>> To multihome with PA space, you must ensure that your transit >>> providers, >>> and any of their transit providers (recursive), accept your /48 >>> from each >>> other. >>> >>> Still pretty simple, no? >> >> There's an implicit assumption here that peers (as opposed to >> upstream >> transits) do not filter. History has shown counting on this to be >> unwise. > > No, I'm not making that assumption. I'm saying that only your > transit-free transit providers need to exchange your route. > Everyone else How do I determine which of my transit providers are transit-free ? What do I do if one fine day no provider available to me is transit- free ? Regards Marshall > can send the traffic towards the provider's /32 aggregate, and once it > enters the provider's network the more-specific /48 will take over. > That's not ideal for traffic engineering or route optimization, but > it's > adequate for reachability. > > -Scott
- Previous message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Next message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list