[ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
Marshall Eubanks
tme at multicasttech.com
Thu Jun 29 13:25:33 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Next message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello; On Jun 29, 2006, at 1:07 PM, brian.knight at us.mizuho-sc.com wrote: >> What makes punching holes in PA space more attractive than PI >> space for >> them? >> >> This is not an idle question. While there are many obvious >> technical and >> business reasons for multihomers getting PI space, I'm unable to >> identify >> _any_ reasons for the end site to prefer PA. > > What if the site is unable to justify PI space? > > My organization cannot justify any space under the adopted proposal > 2005-1, > and we multihome today. Unless the policy is changed or ISP's > allow us to > announce PA space, we can't move to v6. Why not ? Is the 2002-3 IPv4 /22 too stringent ? What would you change ? > > Personally speaking, I wouldn't mind a requirement to obtain PI > space if I > knew it was required to multihome and it was easy to justify such > space. I > don't think my organization would have a problem with it, either. > > I would support a measure similar to the APNIC proposal mentioned > by Randy. > Note that all prop-035-v001 requires is multi-homing, which was indeed one of the variants of 2005-1. Marshall >> You're missing the point. PIv6 is all about giving people the >> _ability_ > to >> multihome. Multihoming in PA space (v4 or v6) is not an option >> for both >> technical and business reasons. > > Honest questions follow. > > Is the goal simply to prevent carving up /32's? How will that measure > control routing table size? > > Or, put another way: To the DFZ router operators, what is the > difference if > the /48 comes from the ISP or from ARIN? > > It seemed that many people had been comfortable with multihoming in PA > space. When did that change? > > -Brian Knight > Sr. Network Engineer > Mizuho Securities USA, Futures Division > http://www.mizuho-sc.com/ > > * Please note that I do not speak for my employer - only for myself. > _______________________________________________ > PPML mailing list > PPML at arin.net > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
- Previous message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Next message: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list