[ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-1: Residential Customer Privacy
J Bacher
jb at jbacher.com
Wed Aug 23 09:40:47 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-1: Residential Customer Privacy
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-1: Residential Customer Privacy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Owen DeLong wrote: > A residential customer should, in all cases, have the option of > publishing their information as any other > internet user. The option of hiding residential address is not > unreasonable, however, at the least, > city, state, and non-specific postal code should be preserved (5- > digit ZIP (US), first 3 characters This is not reasonable for those in low population dense areas. > Realistically, more information than this is a matter of public > record if the customer has registered to vote. Realistically, a lot of people aren't registered to vote. If the upstream ISP is willing to assume responsibility, the need to publish the assignment address is not necessary. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-1: Residential Customer Privacy
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-1: Residential Customer Privacy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list