[ppml] early adopter advantage
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Sat Oct 29 13:50:07 EDT 2005
- Previous message: [ppml] early adopter advantage
- Next message: [ppml] early adopter advantage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I don't think that PI space will help start the drive. However, I do believe that the lack of PI space is definitely preventing the adoption. Owen --On October 29, 2005 8:56:29 AM -0700 Benjamin Crawford <bicrawf at yahoo.com> wrote: > I agree with Paul. I think putting off a policy for > PI space due to concerns on giving certain special > advantages might be a little off based. If allowing > PI space will help start the drive towards adoption of > IPv6, it make sense to try to make that available. If > a PI policy is put on the shelf while non-PI > alternatives are developed, I think a lot of people > continue propagating IPv4 and continue to push out the > adoption of v6. > > -Ben Crawford > > --- Paul Vixie <paul at vix.com> wrote: > >> it's been spake several times today that one big >> problem with the IPv6 PI >> proposal was that it would not scale to the full >> IPv6 population, and >> therefore we ought to craft a policy that gave no >> special advantages to >> the early adopters. MIT and Stanford and DEC and HP >> all having "class A" >> IPv6 networks whereas China can't get one, was cited >> as an example of this. >> >> another more specific concern i heard today was "if >> we allow PI IPv6 space >> then there will be no incentive to develop non-PI >> multihoming technology". >> >> i think both of these concerns are misplaced. if we >> want there to be an >> IPv6 network economy we're going to have to give >> folks what they need to >> become early adopters, and if they're asking for PI >> IPv6, then we have to >> at least listen. furthermore, the incentive to more >> quickly develop non-PI >> alternatives for IPv6 multihoming might actually be >> higher if there's PI >> space being granted, since it's *such* a bad idea in >> the long run. (this >> assumes that the primary developers of non-PI IPv6 >> multihoming technology >> will be vendors and registries rather than >> end-users; this seems ~likely.) >> _______________________________________________ >> PPML mailing list >> PPML at arin.net >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml >> > > > > > __________________________________ > Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > _______________________________________________ > PPML mailing list > PPML at arin.net > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml -- If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably a forgery. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/attachments/20051029/1f04a55a/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [ppml] early adopter advantage
- Next message: [ppml] early adopter advantage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list