[ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor
Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Fri Oct 28 07:21:33 EDT 2005
- Previous message: [ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor
- Next message: [ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> - one-size-fits-all probably isn't useful in the long run. Yes. > - host-counts are stupid. Agreed. The size of v6 allocations is not related to the number of hosts. Hostcounts are v4 thinking. > - a strict multi-homing requirement is perfectly reasonable. Yes. And since this requires an ASN and since there are some 12,000 ASNs in the ARIN region this would tend to limit the number of end-user PI blocks to the 5,000-10,000 range which some people desire. > - preexisting IPv4 deployment should qualify you for IPv6 assignment. Yes. Why do people need IPv6 addresses? To deploy a network. How do they prove that they will deploy a network? Show that they have already done so using v4 addresses. > - the size of the assignment should probably be /48 times the number of > sites you have already deployed. More or less. Round this number up to some rational bit boundary. And I assume that the "already deployed" refers to preexisting v4 deployment. > - in order to avoid creative interpretation of "sites," no more than one > site per metro area should be counted. That's arbitrary, but it's an > objectively-verifiable quantity, which is what's needed for the ARIN > analyst staff. No, too restrictive. I agree that we need a verifiable definition of "site" but I think this can be done in a way that allows multiple sites per city. Two possible ways to prove it to ARIN analysts are to provide an IP address per site that can be tracerouted to show a unique path or ISP bills/contracts that demonstrate one circuit per site. I'm sure that there are other ways of proving site count such as municipal tax bills, water bills, etc. Rather than define "site" we should refer to IPv6 RFCs which talk about how to assign /48s. As long as the count is consistent with IPv6 network design practices, it should be allowable. If a company has one router per floor of their building, then it is one site per floor. If they have one router per building on their campus then it is one site per building. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor
- Next message: [ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list