[ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor

I would expect all those who didn't support the policy on the grounds of routing/FIB table growth also to object to the original 2005-1 text.

Andrew


>  -------Original Message-------
>  From: Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net>
>  Subject: [ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor
>  Sent: 27 Oct '05 16:30
>  
>  
>  I say we go back to what owendelongtellmenetworks proposed, and see if there
>  was anything we actually didn't like about it.
>  
>  
>                                   -Bill
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  PPML mailing list
>  PPML at arin.net
>  http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
>