[ppml] IPv6>>32
David Conrad
david.conrad at nominum.com
Tue May 10 21:18:15 EDT 2005
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6>>32
- Next message: [ppml] IPv6>>32
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Forgive me. A vain attempt at being ironic. I left off the smiley. I, of course, do not consider RIR polices to be unfair or draconian. In fact, I feel the current mechanisms by which policies are defined are better than they have ever been. Also, to be clear, I am not speaking as a board member on this list. Hope that clears up any possible confusion. Rgds, -drc Not speaking for anyone but myself. On May 10, 2005, at 6:12 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >> I doubt IPv4 will ever run out. As the unallocated pool of IPv4 >> becomes smaller and, as a result, RIRs policies and procedures become >> even more unfair and draconian >> > > perhaps, as a board member of an rir, you could explain why you > conscience unfair and draconian policies? > > randy > >
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6>>32
- Next message: [ppml] IPv6>>32
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list