[ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv6 HD ratio
Bill Darte
billd at cait.wustl.edu
Tue May 10 12:59:25 EDT 2005
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6>>32
- Next message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv6 HD ratio
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > It seems to me following the various threads that there is little > > resistance to the HD Ratio change. > > i suspect that some folk may not understand all of the > implications. heck, i probably don't. but one would seem to > be that it makes it even harder for the smaller folk and not > too much harder for the larger. > > randy > Do you suggest a split level of HD Ratio requirement...one ratio for large and another for small? If so, where would the demarc be? Bill Darte
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6>>32
- Next message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv6 HD ratio
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list