[ppml] IPv6>>32
David Conrad
david.conrad at nominum.com
Tue May 10 12:18:53 EDT 2005
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6>>32
- Next message: [ppml] IPv6>>32
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Terry, On May 10, 2005, at 8:31 AM, Davis, Terry L wrote: > V4 never considered the idea that entire networks would "undock" from > the Internet and then "move between continents" and attempt to "dock" > with the Internet again. While this might be true, it can be argued that given v6 uses the same routing technology as v4, v6 also doesn't consider the idea that networks can dock and undock. The same solution that is (at least theoretically) usable for IPv4 is what is being proposed for IPv6 -- provider independent addresses. Rgds, -drc
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6>>32
- Next message: [ppml] IPv6>>32
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list