[ppml] Re: Re: 2005-1:Multi-national Business Enablement
Lea Roberts
lea.roberts at stanford.edu
Tue May 3 18:43:03 EDT 2005
- Previous message: [ppml] Re: Re: 2005-1:Multi-national Business Enablement
- Next message: [ppml] Re: Re: 2005-1:Multi-national Business Enablement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel (et al) - the original 2005-1 did not receive overwhelming support from the community, so it will be revised in keeping with the feedback given in Orlando. there will probaboy need to be a much higher bar to get through the process at this time.... sorry, /Lea On Tue, 3 May 2005, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:05:20PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > > Without sensible policies, I won't be getting IPv6 at home (or at work, if > > > 2005-1 doesn't pass) at all. It's not routing or transit in the core that > > > we're waiting on now -- it's address policies at the edge. > > > > 2005-1 is not for the home. 2005-1 is for organizations (read: > > businesses) that have a need for multihoming, that means multiple > > separate physical upstreams and a vast userbase and LIR membership. > > Or are you going to polute BGP with /128's ? > > Did you actully read 2005-1? > > 2005-1 refers to "end-site organizations", not businesses. I don't think > that Owen meant "businesses" when he wrote "organizations". This "only > big business shalt be independent" thinking is a disease. > > Further, there is no requirement for either "separate physical > upstreams", "vast userbase" or "LIR membership" in there. Not even > implicitly derrived from ASN assignment policy, as you need none of > those to qualify for an ASN. > > For recollection, here is the proposed policy text of 2005-1 again: > > <cite> > 6.11 Assignments to End-sites with Autonomous System Numbers > > Any end-site which meets the current criteria for assignment of an > autonomous system number (ASN) shall also qualify for one IPv6 prefix > assignment of the minimum size justified under the ARIN guidelines for > assignment by an LIR. If the organization grows to require more space, > it will not be entitled to an additional block, but rather may obtain a > new, replacement block of sufficient size to meet its needs in exchange > for making the commitment to return its existing block within 24 months, > so that it may be reassigned. > </cite> > > > Regards, > Daniel > > -- > CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 >
- Previous message: [ppml] Re: Re: 2005-1:Multi-national Business Enablement
- Next message: [ppml] Re: Re: 2005-1:Multi-national Business Enablement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list