[ppml] Re: 2005-1:Multi-national Business Enablement

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net] On 
> Behalf Of Daniel Roesen
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 12:39 AM
> To: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: [ppml] Re: 2005-1:Multi-national Business Enablement
> 
>
> > > Over here (DE), almost all residential users use dial-up, 
> be it real 
> > > (analog, ISDN) or virtual (DSL, via PPPoE). So they are connected 
> > > via virtual interfaces, and get their IP address usually 
> via dynamic 
> > > pools or static via RADIUS. No problem adapting this to 
> assign /48s 
> > > (especially via RADIUS).
> > 
> > If that's the topology, then that makes sense.  However, 
> it's not the 
> > dominant topology in the US today.
> 
> And global IPv6 policies should adapt to US legacy? Or what 
> are you asking for?
> 
> [my presumption is that we want to reach global policies, not 
> regional ones for that]


When posting to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List, on the topic of Policy
Proposal 2005-1, it is reasonable to assume the context is regional policy.
There are good reasons why we have regional policy forums, facilitated by
the Regional Internet Registries.

Lee
 
 
> Best regards,
> Daniel
> 
> -- 
> CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
>