transfer policy
Kim Hubbard
kimh at arin.net
Mon May 15 09:49:51 EDT 2000
- Previous message: transfer policy
- Next message: transfer policy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Well, one reason we ask for utilization of the addresses is so that if it's not being utilized efficiently (or at all which is true in some cases) we can ask for it to be returned or traded for a smaller block. There have been quite a few cases where a /16 was transfered with a network consisting of 300 hosts. We always try to talk the organization into getting a smaller block but we don't have the authority right now to demand they do so. It's also important that we know the organization that's receiving the addresses knows exactly what they have. With all of the consolidation going on it's clear that a lot of organizations don't even know what they're buying. They have no idea how addresses are being utilized in some cases so by asking for utilization it helps everyone in the long run. Kim At 11:01 PM 5/12/00 -0600, Danny McPherson wrote: > >So if not with legacy issues, then what does it help with? > >And if with nothing, then providing it shouldn't be a problem? > >-danny > >> I wouldn't say that justification itself helps with the legacy issues. >>
- Previous message: transfer policy
- Next message: transfer policy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the POLICY mailing list