too many routes
Mike Handley
handley at admin.microserve.net
Wed Sep 10 15:46:07 EDT 1997
- Previous message: too many routes
- Next message: Explanation of why you are getting this mail
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I have also gotten several! Why? Mike Handley handley at microserve.net On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Jim Rosser wrote: > Hello! > > Why are you sending me this crap? > > Jim Rosser, jim at ssmc.demon.co.uk > > ---------- > > From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com> > > To: Joseph T. Klein <jtk at titania.net> > > Cc: Jon Lewis <jlewis at inorganic5.fdt.net>; Michael Dillon > <michael at priori.net>; naipr at arin.net > > Subject: Re: too many routes > > Date: Wednesday, September 10, 1997 08:35 > > > > Joseph, > > > > Joseph T. Klein wrote: > > > > > > A system must be established that will NOT keep new entities from > entering the market. > > > I would rather see a world with 30 or 40 backbones, vs. a world with > one. > > > > Yep! I have been saying this for some time now (2 or 3 years). > > > > > > The concept of upstream providers providing address space does not > work for > > > organizations seeking to establish national or international networks. > > > > It sure doesn't. And is the fundamental problem with the "Upstream > > Provider" system along with the RFC's that go along with this > > method (Rfc2050, Rfc 1918, RFC1917). > > > > > > If I am to build a network to 5 major meet points and contract with > UUNET, and > > > MCI for transit, why should I put up with the InetrNIC or ARIN telling > me > > > that I must get a block of addresses from an upstream??! How the do you > expect > > > to establish new backbones without a loophole for new providers to get > a /19 > > > and an ASN? Even to anty up to do this, we are in the 1 Million $$$ > range. > > > > YEs! I have been trying to get this across for some time now. Glad > > you are on board with common sense. > > > > > > Come on registry people ... give the open market model a chance. > > > > Don't count on it. We shall have to build our own I fear. > > > > > > --- On Tue, 9 Sep 1997 23:41:50 -0400 (EDT) Jon Lewis > <jlewis at inorganic5.fdt.net> wrote: > > - snip - > > > -- > > > From: Joseph T. Klein, Titania Corporation http://www.titania.net > > > mailto:jtk at titania.net Sent: 02:53:06 CST/CDT > 09/10/97 > > > > > > If the Internet stumbles, it will not be because we lack for > technology, > > > vision, or motivation. It will be because we cannot set a direction > > > and march collectively into the future. > > > -- http://info.isoc.org/internet-history/#Future > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Jeffrey A. Williams > > DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng. > > Information Eng. Group. IEG. INC. > > Phone :913-294-2375 (v-office) > > E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com > ~ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Handley MicroServe Information Systems Mail: handley at admin.microserve.net Engineering Tip of the Week/Month by Mike Handley: ---If you could unknow anyone you already know, whom would it be?---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: too many routes
- Next message: Explanation of why you are getting this mail
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list