past vs future use
Larry Vaden
vaden at texoma.net
Mon Jun 30 13:08:54 EDT 1997
- Previous message: past vs future use
- Next message: past vs future use
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 10:13 PM 6/29/97 +0100, Jeff Williams wrote: > My question to you, is, are you speeking authoritativly? > >> >> >> The expected procedure for a new ISP is thus: >> >> >> >> 1. Connect to an upstream provider >> >> 2. Obtain some PA IPs from that provider >> >> 3. Efficiently assign those IPs to your customers OR do a bunch of >> >> fake SWIPs that make it look like you're efficient >> >> 4. Repeat 2 and 3 until you have ~8192 PA IPs >> >> 5. Trade in your PA IPs for a /19 allocation >> >> 6. Make every customer you have renumber What is outlined here is a LOW ROAD procedure which is used by some. There is software available to emulate large modem pools, e.g., complete with response times to fake the latency time of a connection via a 14.4, 28.8, 33.6 modem. What IT is seeking/proposing is a HIGH ROAD solution. --- Larry Vaden, founder and CEO help-desk 903-813-4500 Internet Texoma, Inc. direct 903-870-0365 <http://www.texoma.net> fax 903-868-8551 bringing the real Internet to rural Texomaland pager 903-867-6571
- Previous message: past vs future use
- Next message: past vs future use
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list