ARIN /8s ?
Karl Auerbach
karl at CAVEBEAR.COM
Sun Jun 29 23:40:54 EDT 1997
- Previous message: ARIN /8s ?
- Next message: ARIN /8s ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Before we go off further onto this tangent, my feeling is that we drop the discussion of "ownership" and talk more about the mutual obligations which should be imposed to ensure that the recapture of addresses can't be called an arbitrary or capricious processs. I suggest that ARIN say (as I believe it does) that addresses assignements may be changed, and even withdrawn. In addition, ARIN should say that such assignments won't be withdrawn or changed without N months prior notice and that once an assignment is made, it won't be withdrawn or changed except after a minimum of one year. And ARIN should require that these provisions be imposed as part of any sub-delegation/assignment. That's pretty close to the way most real property leases work, and no one who receives a delegation could realistically (I hope) complain that such terms are too onerous. Similarly, we should have our network planning stable enough that we can add a couple of months delay before yanking or changing anyone's address block. --karl--
- Previous message: ARIN /8s ?
- Next message: ARIN /8s ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list