past vs future use
Jeff Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Sat Jun 28 15:17:24 EDT 1997
- Previous message: past vs future use
- Next message: past vs future use
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kim and all, Kim Hubbard wrote: > > > > > At 05:02 PM 6/28/97 -0400, Kim Hubbard wrote: > > >Jeff, > > > > > >The section of the RFC you are quoting is for end-user assignments, not > > >ISP allocations. ISPs requesting address space from the InterNIC must > > >show they've efficiently utilized a /19 already in order to justify receiving > > >a /19 or shorter prefix which is the longest prefix that is currently > > >globally routable. > > > > > >One of the first things we would like to accomplish with ARIN is to update > > >the allocation policies in coordination with its members. If you have any > > >suggestions please send them to the pagan mailing list...pagan at apnic.net. > > > > > >Kim > > > > Kim, > > > > Neither APNIC or RIPE requires prior efficient utilization of a /19 for an > > ISP. InterNIC does. > > RIPE and APNIC have a built in deterrent to keep everyone from requesting > their automatic /19....the annual fee. InterNIC does not have this deterrent. > > > > What is the authority for doing so? > > > > If it is in RFC2050, please point it out `[8-)) > > The RFC states that you must justify the allocation of a fully routable > block. Part of the justification (which InterNIC requires) is that you > have already issued this much space to your customer base, this shows, as > I said before, that you already have a customer base and that you know how > to efficiently utilize the space. The RFC also states that projections > are not enough justification, therefore, those ISPs that project that they > will have 100 customers in the next 3 months are not issued space on that > basis alone, but if you have retained 100 customers in the last 3 months than > we agree that it is likely you will continue this growth and will issue > you the space based on that information. Yes, Know this part and understand. Sitll it does not answer the original question. Whish was, "If I was to start a new Regional ISP (Which I may shortly), and I request some /19's, you are saying I can't get them becouse I have no previous allocation of /19's. Where does this circle end? Where and how do I get the allocation I need for any type allocation for that matter without prior efficient use, or in this case, any use, in that this is a new ISP? It may be a medium size ISP, or larg or x-large? PLEASE ADVISE! > > Kim Hubbard > InterNIC Registry > > > > Otherwise, please point out the URL of the real rules. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > --- > > > > Larry Vaden, founder and CEO help-desk 903-813-4500 > > Internet Texoma, Inc. <http://www.texoma.net> direct 903-870-0365 > > Member, Board of Directors, ISP/C fax 903-868-8551 > > bringing the real Internet to rural Texomaland pager 903-867-6571 > > Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng. Information Eng. Group. IEG. INC. Phone :913-294-2375 (v-office) E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
- Previous message: past vs future use
- Next message: past vs future use
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list