past vs future use
Kim Hubbard
kimh at internic.net
Sat Jun 28 19:41:03 EDT 1997
- Previous message: past vs future use
- Next message: past vs future use
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > At 04:30 PM 6/28/97 -0400, Jon Lewis wrote: > > > >Can an ISP justify allocations via swip by assigning 300% more space than > >initially needed to all of its end users? > > > > I'm not sure about 300%, but 800-1600% seems to work (i.e., those ISPs > using static ip assignment for dialup customers) `[8-(( > I don't have information on the ratio of IPs to customers for, e.g., @HOME, > but 24.0.0.0 seems to contain a lot of cable television firms with large > CIDR blocks. > > I presume prior efficient utilization of a /19 could be documented with a > Freedom of Information Act request along with protective orders for any > confidential information. Everything that is not confidential is already available in WHOIS via the SWIPped information, I would assume that most ISPs would consider the rest of their documented data to be confidential. Kim Hubbard InterNIC Registry > > > > > > --- > > Larry Vaden, founder and CEO help-desk 903-813-4500 > Internet Texoma, Inc. <http://www.texoma.net> direct 903-870-0365 > Member, Board of Directors, ISP/C fax 903-868-8551 > bringing the real Internet to rural Texomaland pager 903-867-6571 >
- Previous message: past vs future use
- Next message: past vs future use
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list