past vs future use

On Sat, 28 Jun 1997, Kim Hubbard wrote:

> The section of the RFC you are quoting is for end-user assignments, not
> ISP allocations.  ISPs requesting address space from the InterNIC must
> show they've efficiently utilized a /19 already in order to justify receiving
> a /19 or shorter prefix which is the longest prefix that is currently

Before someone asks again, "how do you show past efficient utilization of
a /19 if you don't have one?", I'll say that I assume you mean a /19 worth
of space, whether that's 2 or more /20's or a bunch of smaller allocations
from the upstream provider.  If that's not the case, let us know. 


------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis <jlewis at fdt.net>  |  Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
 Network Administrator       |  be proof-read for $199/message.
 Florida Digital Turnpike    |  
________Finger jlewis at inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______