past vs future use
Jon Lewis
jlewis at inorganic5.fdt.net
Sat Jun 28 16:30:40 EDT 1997
- Previous message: past vs future use
- Next message: past vs future use
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 28 Jun 1997, Kim Hubbard wrote: > > evidently allocation and assignment of ip numbers are different. > > evidently sect 3.1 is not intended to apply to isps. > > Gordon, the document clearly states there is a difference between > allocations and assignments and that allocations are for ISPs and assignments > are for end-users. But why is it so much easier for an end user to get a large assignment than it is for an ISP to get a large allocation?...large in both cases being relative to immediate needs. Can an ISP justify allocations via swip by assigning 300% more space than initially needed to all of its end users? ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jon Lewis <jlewis at fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/message. Florida Digital Turnpike | ________Finger jlewis at inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______
- Previous message: past vs future use
- Next message: past vs future use
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list