past vs future use
Jeff Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Sat Jun 28 09:55:59 EDT 1997
- Previous message: past vs future use
- Next message: past vs future use
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jon, No disagreement here. >;) Jon Lewis wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Jun 1997, Gordon Cook wrote: > > > Sigh! relevant points. > > > > evidently allocation and assignment of ip numbers are different. > > evidently sect 3.1 is not intended to apply to isps. > > > > now that I have begun to look a little more closely at this stuff, it is > > NOT at all as clear as I would have hoped. > > It appears I'd skimmed over 3.0 too fast and should have been looking at > 2.x instead. Why are ISP's treated as second class citizens in RFC 2050? > An end user enterprise can qualify for a /19 if they will use 1/4 of it > immediately, and 50% in the next year or so. According to guideline 4 for > ISP's, it looks as if an ISP must prove they will fully use an allocation > in 3 months, and 2.2 suggests that they must swip at least 80% of the > first allocation to be considered for further ones. Should I submit > swip's for the blocks I use for virtual servers and dynamic dialup IP's? > > > I hope that we will begin to have a discussion of some of these issues > > over the next few days. what's the address of pagn kim? I am very > > interested in your and the arin board and jon postels views on a range of > > procedural issues. > > Same here. Also, when will the ARIN issues (like fees and membership) be > ironed out now that ARIN has been "approved". I still think it's > ridiculous to not give a membership (at no extra cost) to any entity that > has paid for an allocation. > > i.e. After FDT pays for an allocation, assuming we can qualify, I think > FDT should be an ARIN member (at no additional charge) for as long as it > uses ARIN assigned space. Does anyone disagree with this? If so, I'd > like to know why. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Jon Lewis <jlewis at fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will > Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/message. > Florida Digital Turnpike | > ________Finger jlewis at inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______ -- Jeffrey A. Williams DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng. Information Eng. Group. IEG. INC. Phone :913-294-2375 (v-office) E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
- Previous message: past vs future use
- Next message: past vs future use
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list