Efficient use of bandwidth (was: Re: The latest)
Dave Crocker
dcrocker at BRANDENBURG.COM
Wed Jun 25 23:29:55 EDT 1997
- Previous message: The latest
- Next message: The latest
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>Jeff Williams writes: Folks, Please note the number of messages, time, bandwidth and energy consumed by this lates silliness, initiated by Jeff. The burden of truly open communications is that we cannot prevent such people from posting such mail. The burden of filtering is moved to each of us, individually. We need to use extreme care in choosing what mail to respond to. We need to evaluate whether original messages are worth responding to and we need to evaluate whether other people's responses are sufficient. In other words, we need to consider whether our own messages are REALLY necessary or whether they will end up just adding traffic to the list but not really being all that important or helpful. Typically that means that such notes are just redundant. This is a very difficult job for each of us. None of us is perfect, but I entreat us all to consider the need. Some people are not worth responding to. Some responses from others are sufficient and our own responses aren't really necessary. To make the global, open lists have reasonabel load, we need to stop responding to silly people and we need to avoid posting notes of small or little incremental benefit. For example, there is no need to respond to this note from me. Instead, there is a need to stop responding to people like Jeff. d/
- Previous message: The latest
- Next message: The latest
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list