The latest

Jerry,

Jerry Scharf wrote:
> 
> > >
> > > For the in-addr.arpa zone, there is the necessary installation and management
> > > of NS records for delegation. This has worked successfully for years and no
> > > one that I know sees any problem with how it works.
> >
> >   How this works currently is correct.  How it will work in the near
> > future is a hourse of a diffrent breed.  One of the points I made
> > previously in my post.  And this is one of the points that I think
> > is critical.
> >
> 
> There is no sign whatsoever that this will change. I ask you to show one piece
> of documentation from anyone responsible for the current or proposed
> management of in-addr.arpa saying that it will change.

  I would say in a very GENERAL sense that volume alone will force 
some change in NS/ip address managment alone.  

> I have no interest in
> comments that are not authoritative, we know there are quacks out there.

  Do you?  Hummmmm?  Well your postings are beginning to sound much 
like one.
> 
> Kim, Daniel, David Randy:
> 
> Can we have a very short response saying that in-addr management will not
> change in basic ways from how it is done now an dispense with this nonsense.

  Who are these guys?  Authoritative?  Says whom?  By whos and what
authority?  
> 
> thanks,
> jerry

Regards,
-- 
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
Information Eng. Group. IEG. INC. 
Phone :913-294-2375 (v-office)
E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com