Important News from Don Telage about ARIN
Eric Weisberg
editor at txlaw.com
Thu Jul 17 14:10:07 EDT 1997
- Previous message: a quick ps to long post
- Next message: Rebuttal to Mr. Weisberg's insinuations Re: Important News from Don Telage about ARIN
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gordon, Thanks for the very interesting report. However, I fear it will have the opposite effect on your readers than you intended. Let me highlight some examples: Gordon Cook wrote: > (1.) The three > CURRENT members of the ARIN board are himself, Kim Hubbard, and Phil > Sbarbaro, outside legal counsel to NSI. Unsophisticatd readers will conclude that Don Telage IS the ARIN board for now. > I had found out that article 8 of the By-laws said > that within one year of the date of the incorporation the board was > obligated to have procedures in place for the immediate election of the > advisory council members by the ARIN membership - thus letting the air out > of the argument that the ARIN board would be a self perpetuating monopoly. This will just make people ask questions. What did it say til now? What objectionable features are being left in place? Why don't the members elect the advisory council from the beginning? Why not devise the new procedures in one, two or three months? Why aren't the members electing the board? > But I complained that the by-laws were not yet on the web site. Why not? > Because they are still being revised. I replied that, in view of the > situation, if ARIN is to have a chance at being successful, it would sure > as heck help to get the current version up there with a statement that > there might be subsequent revisions. For many readers, this statement probably confirms the allegation that Telage, alone, is making the basic decisions rather than seeking rough concensuson on how the Internet community should organize itself to distribute community resources. You mention having suggested the need to report his decisions soon after they are made and post them on the website. It may have been a mistake to report that Telage did not reply to your suggestion. I am not sure why you related this if he did not agree to do it. This particular comment probably also left the recipients of your rebuttal wondering "Did Gordon ask Telage to let the community discuss the by-laws and the proposed revisions before they become final? What did Telage say about that?" Please continue to keep us informed of what you learn on all this. Eric Weisberg, Gen. Counsel Internet Texoma, Inc. The ISP which DIDN'T
- Previous message: a quick ps to long post
- Next message: Rebuttal to Mr. Weisberg's insinuations Re: Important News from Don Telage about ARIN
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list