No us gov't funding for ARIN was RE: Working Draft with Kim Hubbard Amendment
Michael Dillon
michael at priori.net
Fri Jul 11 23:33:31 EDT 1997
- Previous message: No us gov't funding for ARIN was RE: Working Draft with Kim Hubbard Amendment
- Next message: Thom Stark on ARIN
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>I was taken aback because this conflicted with what I had earlier been >told. I checked with several sources who have first hand knowledge and >have assured me that the following statement is accurate > >NSI, at the December (1996) IETF, offered to provide TRANSITION funding of >the startup and staffing of ARIN. They legally committed themselves to do >this as a part of their year 5 program plan with NSF. They are now >carrying out that commitment. The costs involved will be significantly >greater that the $300K total figure in Michael dillon's post here this >evening. These costs include ZERO US government funds. I've got to learn to stop trusting the press :-) Now that I read over http://www.emap.com/cwi/187/187news6.html again I see that they have ARIN and IANA all garbled up together. *sigh* ******************************************************** Michael Dillon voice: +1-415-482-2840 Senior Systems Architect fax: +1-415-482-2844 PRIORI NETWORKS, INC. http://www.priori.net "The People You Know. The People You Trust." ********************************************************
- Previous message: No us gov't funding for ARIN was RE: Working Draft with Kim Hubbard Amendment
- Next message: Thom Stark on ARIN
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list