PI/19 allocations to multihomed ISPs was Re: pagans...
Gordon Cook
cook at NETAXS.COM
Wed Jul 9 00:00:22 EDT 1997
- Previous message: PI/19 allocations to multihomed ISPs was Re: pagans...
- Next message: PI/19 allocations to multihomed ISPs was Re: pagans...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ken i agree with everything you say. And I take my hat off to one of the minority voices of reason on this list. In naming you and jsutin i was trying to capture the idea of clueful representative of the smaller ISPs. I thing the arin board is pretty darned represenative of the net considering it is only five people. ************************************************************************ The COOK Report on Internet For subsc. pricing & more than 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA ten megabytes of free material (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) visit http://cookreport.com/ Internet: cook at cookreport.com On line speech of critics under attack by Ewing NJ School Board, go to http://cookreport.com/sboard.shtml ************************************************************************ On Tue, 8 Jul 1997, Ken Leland wrote: > > Gordon wrote. > > > Telage is an honorable man but unfortunately in my opinion, he does not > > "grok" the internet. I do think the arin board would have a better > > composition with justin newton or ken leland there in place of telage. > ^^^^^^^^^^ > Thank you very much Gordon, but I haven't made the many years of personal > blood sweat and tears contribution/innovation in the basic net makeup > -RFC's etc- that our community looks for and *needs* in an ARIN trustee. > This is the prime reason why most of us don't think our current Trustees > Scott, Randy et al, will screw it up - They just have too much invested in > their labor of love - The Internet. Its the same reason we want Vixie > making sure that DNS doesn't break, he would rather loose an arm than > see that happen. > > > nevertheless Telage is spending a million dollars to cut arin loose > > so I guess they figured it would be impolite to keep him off. > > Still if he had stayed off it would have had a positive impact on NSIs > > image in my opinion. > > > > On the other hand, his staying does make some sense from a transition > standpoint. > > ken >
- Previous message: PI/19 allocations to multihomed ISPs was Re: pagans...
- Next message: PI/19 allocations to multihomed ISPs was Re: pagans...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list