There are three related issues the registries are getting hit over the
head to fix:
1) limitiation on address space
2) limitations of router forwarding table space
3) limitations of router CPU for processing updates.
While my understanding is that the current criticality ordering of
these resources is 3, 2, 1, this does NOT mean that limitation on
address space is not a concern. Revocation would simply mean that it
would continue to be third in the prioritization.
>> I propose that Internic reclaim any registered block over one year old
>> which is not advertised in the global routing tables
>If a block is not being advertised, then it is not filling router table
>And since our underlying problem is router table space, not the number
>prefixes available, revocation won't help fix the underlying problem.