Forcible reclamation?
Ken Leland
kwl at SHELL.MONMOUTH.COM
Tue Jul 8 02:06:53 EDT 1997
- Previous message: Forcible reclamation?
- Next message: Forcible reclamation?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
karl wrote: > > > > I propose that Internic reclaim any registered block over one year old > > which is not advertised in the global routing tables > > If a block is not being advertised, then it is not filling router table > space. > > And since our underlying problem is router table space, not the number > prefixes available, revocation won't help fix the underlying problem. > Well, assorted net gurus are maintaining that the problem is both router table space and allocated space. This seems reasonable to me since there is actually a tradeoff between the two that is being managed. Ken Leland kwl at monmouth.com
- Previous message: Forcible reclamation?
- Next message: Forcible reclamation?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list