Justin's proposed changes.
Raymundo Vega Aguilar
rvega at cicese.mx
Tue Jan 28 16:47:25 EST 1997
- Previous message: Justin's proposed changes.
- Next message: Justin's proposed changes.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > I am for the motion. > I am opposed to the motion but willing to go along. > I am against the motion. > > If those three states were weighted 1, 0.5 and 0 then one could say that > consensus was reached when the sum of the voting states was greater than > 50% of the number of members. Thus, on a board with 6 members, if 1 member > is opposed to a motion and all others are willing to go along we have > a voting status equal to 5 * 0.5 + 1 * 0 for a total of 2.5 which is > less than the total of 3.0 required. However, if one of those people > changed to support the motion the voting state would be > 1 * 1 + 4 * 0.5 + 1 * 0 for a total of 3.0 which passes the motion. This is voting with a few more bits of resolution. Raymundo.
- Previous message: Justin's proposed changes.
- Next message: Justin's proposed changes.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list