Rationale
Stephen Satchell
satchell at accutek.com
Sat Jan 18 15:52:33 EST 1997
- Previous message: Reject the NAIPR
- Next message: Rationale
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
As a new member to the list, I am interested in locating a rationale for the fee schedule as described in <http://www.arin.net/index.html> as of 18 Jan 1997. As someone who has followed many of the discussions, I understand much of the terminology, but for someone with other than a background in ARPAnet that dates back to the '70s many of the descriptions are in a shorthand which is almost impossible to understand. Perhaps reverting to plain English would be an improvement -- I understand there is to be a revision to this document and I await the presentation of it. I'm particularly interested in why the policy membership assessment is set so high. I'm a member of the Telecommunications Industry Association TR-30 as a consultant and my fees have historically been $300 per year -- and that is to cover the cost of paper mailings of notices, ballots for draft standards, and a small administration in Washington. (Corporate fees for the same organization are $10,000 per year for manufacturers.) --- Stephen Satchell, Satchell Evaluations <http://www.accutek.com/~satchell> for contact and other info
- Previous message: Reject the NAIPR
- Next message: Rationale
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list