Why split IP allocations from the Internic?
On Wednesday, February 26, 1997 5:19 AM, Michael Dillon[SMTP:michael at MEMRA.COM] wrote:
@ On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Karl Denninger wrote:
@ > 1) I have not seen anything in the bylaws or operational rules that
@ > state that the initial BOT (who are appointed) will be required to
@ > either stand for election or step down after a short (say, one year)
@ > period of time.
@ > I think this needs to be addressed. If you want to stagger initial
@ > terms, that's fine, but then let's have the NSI folks off the BOT
@ > first -- after the first 12 months.
@ I agree with Karl. This does need to be addressed. It is understandable
@ that the BoT does not want to come out with a firm set of bylaws until
@ they have had a chance to carefully examine all sides of the issue but I
@ think the proposal on the website needs to be turned into more of a
@ working document with some incremental updates based upon public
@ commentary. It's not that hard to do and it would provide a useful point
@ of focus for the discussions on this list.
Has the ISP/C considered helping in this area?
It seems you folks just went through a lot of these issues
and are really getting things organized.
JimFleming at unety.net
JimFleming at unety.s0.g0 (EDNS/IPv8)