Registries differences
John Curran
jcurran at BBNPLANET.COM
Tue Apr 29 15:36:41 EDT 1997
- Previous message: Global council of registries??? (fwd)
- Next message: Registries differences
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 14:17 4/28/97, Jim Fleming wrote: >Once this industry matures, you might be able to >pull them apart...there are pros and cons to doing that... Hi Jim... it's always nice to see a familiar name in the From fields of my inbound mail (of course, seeing the same name can get tiresome after a while... ;-) I'm not on edns-discuss, so I apologize in advance if my message repeats discussion already covered there; I've left both edns and naipr on this message as we're talking about the differences between different resources that might be served by various registries. I agree that a registry is a registry; i.e. the basic function is to record the use of a resource and detect any previous registration. In many cases, there is an implied uniqueness of registration that also needs to be served for the resource to remain useful. All of the above is common between DNS and IP assignments. However, the similarities are nominal compared to the differences in registration process due to additional issues surrounding DNS and IP registrations and the need to develop policy and process which reflects very different constituencies. For example, in the case of domain names, the process used to perform registrations and the policies under which work is performed may have to consider some fun intellectual property (e.g. trademark) concerns, _and_ these policies should be developed by a body which reflects the very diverse constituency. In the case of IP allocation policies, there is a set of requirements for routability and conservation which need to be considered, and this means a policy body with a different constituency than the DNS case above. I suppose it's possible to have one *big* group work on both issues, but the IP routing folks and IP lawyers (different IP :-) would end up in quite a few discussions without enough context. I'd much rather keep the discussions (and solutions :-) separate as we're far more likely to get outcomes which are relevant; on the other hand, I can easily see how globbing everything together makes perfect sense if you're only planning for a superficial treatment of the actual issues involved in registering these very different resources. /John
- Previous message: Global council of registries??? (fwd)
- Next message: Registries differences
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list