Global council of registries???
Michael Dillon
michael at MEMRA.COM
Mon Apr 28 22:37:51 EDT 1997
- Previous message: Global council of registries???
- Next message: Global council of registries???
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 28 Apr 1997, Rudolph J. Geist wrote: > The point is that there are certain portions of an ISPs application that > should be subject to attack by other ISPs before that ISP gets numbers. First of all, ISPs are not the only ones who apply to the registries for address space. Secondly, what you are suggesting is tantamount to a cartel ín which existing ISPs decide who gets to join the club. Sorry, but this will *NEVER* happen. ARIN will be applying a set of policies based on RFC2050 just like RIPE, APNIC and the other 2 new registries will be doing. The policies themselves will be discussed and decided upon in open public discussion just as they always have been. However, the information required to make the decisions is too sensitive commercially that it simply cannot be divulged, not even to people within ARIN who don't need it to specifically do their jobs. > Do you not agree that before an ISP gets space, it should have to prove > certain technical characteristics. Yes. And that's why ARIN will have skilled network engineers on staff who will sign non-disclosure agreements and who will examine the applications to make sure they meet the public requirements. In fact, this is exactly how it is done now. > And do you not agree that it is > arbitrary and capricious if say, a very large allocation somehow goes to > an ISP with no technical plan. And do you not agree that there is a > substantial possibility of this happening behind a single closed door > organization. Not likely. While the applications will be confidential, the resulting IP allocations will be full public knowledge. It would be hard to hide any arbitrary and capricious behavior. > Now, don't you agree that if there was a check on this in > the form of peer review (i.e, some proprietary information is required > to be made available to justify technical qualification and need to > receive IPs,) there would be less likelihood of impropoer allocations. No. I think peer review would only politicize the issue and destroy the IP registry. Quite frankly, I don't understand why Erol's has a lawyer involved in what is primarily a network engineering issue. ARIN would probably make a lot more sense to you if you understood how the Internet infrastructure operates. Have you read through all the documents in the Recommended Reading section at http://www.arin.net yet? Michael Dillon - Internet & ISP Consulting Memra Software Inc. - Fax: +1-250-546-3049 http://www.memra.com - E-mail: michael at memra.com
- Previous message: Global council of registries???
- Next message: Global council of registries???
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list