Global council of registries???
Philip J. Nesser II
pjnesser at MARTIGNY.AI.MIT.EDU
Mon Apr 28 21:31:31 EDT 1997
- Previous message: Global council of registries???
- Next message: Global council of registries???
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rudolph J. Geist supposedly said: > > > Can you provide information regarding your last statement? Who has been > > descriminated against? Bear in mind that companies who apply for space > > regularly have a much better chance of submitting a complete application > > with all of the needed details than someone doing it for the first time. > > The IP address allocations are codified as an RFC (I forget the number off > > the top of my head, RFC2050 maybe?), so once again who has not been treated > > fairly? I don't ask this as a rhetorical question, I really want to know > > specifics. > > > > ---> Phil > > Just ask any small or mid-sized company that has requested address space > in the past 9 months, no matter how much money is behind the company, or > what kind of business plans they have. They all get the same runaround > from Internic. Internic states that a company may only obtain address > space if it has a history of efficiently utilizing IPs. But how the > heck can you have a history if you can't get any from Internic? The > response to this question is not that these ISPS should get it from > their upstream provider - and be subject to later renumbering - or the > loss of the IPs during a merger or buy-out, or any other such case. > As much as it is disliked, provider based aggregation is what keeps the net operating right now and is the current accepted policy. I am talking about unfairly applying the rules between two companies. (BTW the ARIN proposal does call for a slight easing of the restriction.) Whether its a bad or a good thing, people who were involved earlier in the Internet have some advantages over new players. Its a sad but true fact. The reasons that drive it are technical in nature, not capricious or discriminiatory as some would claim. I would have loved to have bought Microsoft stock in 1986 at a few dollars a share, but if I want to buy it now I have to pay 115 (or whatever it closed at today). The analagy is rough since IP address space isn't sold but given away if it is being efficiently used. ---> Phil
- Previous message: Global council of registries???
- Next message: Global council of registries???
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list