[dbwg] Notification Process
ginny listman
ginny at arin.net
Fri Mar 7 09:27:45 EST 2003
- Previous message: [dbwg] Notification Process
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 william at elan.net wrote: > In either case I don't think there is much interest in > this being full POC, rather only email is really what is important, so why > not just create special contact with 3 email fields for NT, NA, NR? > We looked at providing notification with a new email attribute as well as defining the new POC types outlined. The new email attribute would require: 1. Major changes to all but the POC template 2. Changes in the database schema 3. Major changes in the registration software 4. If displayed in WHOIS, major changes to WHOIS If we use the newly defined POC types, it would require: 1. Instructional changes to the templates to define the new POC types 2. No changes in the database schema 3. Minor changes in the registration software 4. If displayed in WHOIS, minor changes to WHOIS This comes down to whether to implement within 30 days or 180 days. Ginny
- Previous message: [dbwg] Notification Process
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the DBWG mailing list